<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Link Softly but Carry a Big&#8230; umm&#8230; Just Link Softly Sometimes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/06/22/link-softly-but-carry-a-big-umm-just-link-softly-sometimes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/06/22/link-softly-but-carry-a-big-umm-just-link-softly-sometimes/</link>
	<description>on Link Marketing &#38; News at Text Link Ads</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 09:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Wilks</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/06/22/link-softly-but-carry-a-big-umm-just-link-softly-sometimes/comment-page-1/#comment-1057</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Wilks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 01:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=119#comment-1057</guid>
		<description>Interesting way to build links. Personally I really don&#039;t think it matters how the links are built provided they are &#039;natural&#039; for that &#039;community&#039; and you keep the linking up.

That said, what&#039;s the point of firing crappy links at a site when you can just use a few &#039;trusted&#039; links. I just imagine I am a web librarian and try and keep it natural. (Is it possible to be a link whore and keep it natural - I dunno, it&#039;s a fine line.)

I&#039;d also do a DMOZ submission too.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting way to build links. Personally I really don&#8217;t think it matters how the links are built provided they are &#8216;natural&#8217; for that &#8216;community&#8217; and you keep the linking up.</p>
<p>That said, what&#8217;s the point of firing crappy links at a site when you can just use a few &#8216;trusted&#8217; links. I just imagine I am a web librarian and try and keep it natural. (Is it possible to be a link whore and keep it natural &#8211; I dunno, it&#8217;s a fine line.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also do a DMOZ submission too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bake</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/06/22/link-softly-but-carry-a-big-umm-just-link-softly-sometimes/comment-page-1/#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator>Bake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=119#comment-1056</guid>
		<description>When you say &quot;bake for a bit&quot; how long a bit?  Don&#039;t want to burn the site by baking too long, or get a raw site by not baking it enough...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you say &#8220;bake for a bit&#8221; how long a bit?  Don&#8217;t want to burn the site by baking too long, or get a raw site by not baking it enough&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/06/22/link-softly-but-carry-a-big-umm-just-link-softly-sometimes/comment-page-1/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jun 2006 20:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=119#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>Can i ask something?

You did not mention sandbox, can this help regarding that? I know if you got money or if you can create some buzz you can escape this, but im not in this position in most cases :)

I do have couple test domains up from 2 months of this year on diffrent strategies, one with this one and yes im not boxed, other are.

I have read Matt Cutts interview on SEW blog with M.g. and he said that they need some times to make some calculation for new domains, this probably is related with links, less links i have less calculation.

Can this be true?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can i ask something?</p>
<p>You did not mention sandbox, can this help regarding that? I know if you got money or if you can create some buzz you can escape this, but im not in this position in most cases <img src='http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I do have couple test domains up from 2 months of this year on diffrent strategies, one with this one and yes im not boxed, other are.</p>
<p>I have read Matt Cutts interview on SEW blog with M.g. and he said that they need some times to make some calculation for new domains, this probably is related with links, less links i have less calculation.</p>
<p>Can this be true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

