<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Devaluation of Site Wide Links?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/01/24/devaluation-of-site-wide-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/01/24/devaluation-of-site-wide-links/</link>
	<description>on Link Marketing &#38; News at Text Link Ads</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 09:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy aka Mr Ringtones</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/01/24/devaluation-of-site-wide-links/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy aka Mr Ringtones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=87#comment-679</guid>
		<description>sound advice yes but i have textlinkads.com outward bound links sitewide on my ringtones and music downloads site.

it&#039;s making me ask if i want them sitewide now - i know they pay but if they are to be viewed with less relevancy, which makes perfect sense, what is the impact going to be on my site?

will the se&#039;s think less of us? will my site rank less well? will it be viewed with less relevancy as a result?

two sides to every coin, what&#039;s the score  for us who are hosting the links?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sound advice yes but i have textlinkads.com outward bound links sitewide on my ringtones and music downloads site.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s making me ask if i want them sitewide now &#8211; i know they pay but if they are to be viewed with less relevancy, which makes perfect sense, what is the impact going to be on my site?</p>
<p>will the se&#8217;s think less of us? will my site rank less well? will it be viewed with less relevancy as a result?</p>
<p>two sides to every coin, what&#8217;s the score  for us who are hosting the links?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: submitshop</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/01/24/devaluation-of-site-wide-links/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>submitshop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=87#comment-678</guid>
		<description>So in end it can be concluded that site wide links if not helpful will not even lead to penality just their relevancy will be reduced.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So in end it can be concluded that site wide links if not helpful will not even lead to penality just their relevancy will be reduced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anandsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/01/24/devaluation-of-site-wide-links/comment-page-1/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>anandsoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=87#comment-677</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Its a good analysis. How does Google think of site wide links? Is it treated as single link only?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Its a good analysis. How does Google think of site wide links? Is it treated as single link only?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IrishWonder</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/01/24/devaluation-of-site-wide-links/comment-page-1/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>IrishWonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=87#comment-676</guid>
		<description>&quot;Devaluation of Site Wide Links&quot; actually doesn&#039;t mean &quot;penalty for site wide links&quot; - maybe this is very evident but hey, your post just made me realize there is no &quot;sitewide links penalty&quot; ;-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Devaluation of Site Wide Links&#8221; actually doesn&#8217;t mean &#8220;penalty for site wide links&#8221; &#8211; maybe this is very evident but hey, your post just made me realize there is no &#8220;sitewide links penalty&#8221; <img src='http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/01/24/devaluation-of-site-wide-links/comment-page-1/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=87#comment-675</guid>
		<description>Nice post, sound advice.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, sound advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

