Jan 06
A recent thread (hat tip to Barry) discusses the possible devaluation of site wide links. A "site wide" link is simply a link that appears on ALL pages of a website. A couple of years ago the search engines treated site wide links much different than most do today.
In 2003 and 2004 it seemed that a site wide link on a 1000 page site counted for many links and could very quickly bounce you to the top of many keyword searches. Today is a much different story as many believe site wide links have been reduced to count as "one" link and not as multiple links. Let’s look at the benefits and drawbacks of site wide links:
Benefits
- Your link on all pages of a website gives you a better chance to draw clicks and traffic to your website.
- Your link on all pages still seems to give you some extra weight in MSN rankings.
- Having site wide links can make it more difficult for competitors to analyze your backlinks as they are mixed into your backlink reports. (yes there are ways around this ie a yahoo link: search with "-site:sitewidelinkurlhere.com" but many of your competitors don’t know this or won’t go through the trouble).
Drawbacks
- A site wide link seems to be counted as just a single link so why pay for a site wide link when you only get credit for "one link"?
- Site wide links usually happen in commercial settings and not "naturally" (don’t mind me blogrolls) so engines may discount them even further in the future.
- A site wide link stands out like a sore thumb when competitors check your backlinks and could flag your site as having un natural links as single page links seem more natural.
My advice…
Take any "natural" site wides you get and be thankful you have something worth linking to but when it comes to buying links, buy single page links. They are more under the radar and a safer play for passing on value to your site for the longer term.
6 comments - add your's now
TOPICS
ON TWITTER
- After a two year hiatus, we are bringing the Link Building Blog back from the grave. 2009-08-26
- More updates...
ARCHIVES
- May 2010
- April 2010
- November 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- October 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
Sounds like the perfect prescription to me as well. Take the natural sitewides when you can get ‘em, and buy single links only.
Nice post, sound advice.
“Devaluation of Site Wide Links” actually doesn’t mean “penalty for site wide links” – maybe this is very evident but hey, your post just made me realize there is no “sitewide links penalty”
Hi,
Its a good analysis. How does Google think of site wide links? Is it treated as single link only?
So in end it can be concluded that site wide links if not helpful will not even lead to penality just their relevancy will be reduced.
sound advice yes but i have textlinkads.com outward bound links sitewide on my ringtones and music downloads site.
it’s making me ask if i want them sitewide now – i know they pay but if they are to be viewed with less relevancy, which makes perfect sense, what is the impact going to be on my site?
will the se’s think less of us? will my site rank less well? will it be viewed with less relevancy as a result?
two sides to every coin, what’s the score for us who are hosting the links?