<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How the FRACK is Link Building Blog still sandboxed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/01/04/how-the-frack-is-link-building-blog-still-sandboxed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/01/04/how-the-frack-is-link-building-blog-still-sandboxed/</link>
	<description>on Link Marketing &#38; News at Text Link Ads</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 09:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hgh</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/01/04/how-the-frack-is-link-building-blog-still-sandboxed/comment-page-1/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>hgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 23:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=85#comment-660</guid>
		<description>I wonder is my site is in the sandbox.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder is my site is in the sandbox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Hagans</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/01/04/how-the-frack-is-link-building-blog-still-sandboxed/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Hagans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=85#comment-659</guid>
		<description>Anthony,

Quite honestly, I would NEVER recommend trying to scare people away from linking to you with a legal policy.

Take the links if they&#039;re legit -- they&#039;ll send you traffic to make up for Google AND you won&#039;t have to be so dependent on natural search referrals later.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony,</p>
<p>Quite honestly, I would NEVER recommend trying to scare people away from linking to you with a legal policy.</p>
<p>Take the links if they&#8217;re legit &#8212; they&#8217;ll send you traffic to make up for Google AND you won&#8217;t have to be so dependent on natural search referrals later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Parsons</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/01/04/how-the-frack-is-link-building-blog-still-sandboxed/comment-page-1/#comment-658</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Parsons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=85#comment-658</guid>
		<description>I know what your saying Andy, as I have found the magic sauce to beat the box also, though I won&#039;t mention that. I know Google say all the nonsense about letting a site build naturally, blah blah blah, but honestly, they punish us when doing that. They say not to buy, if caught, their algo will punish us... lose lose. I found the best part of the secret is to use a legal link policy, where people just aren&#039;t aloud to link to a site without written consent. If they do, they remove it, or go legal action... it seems to be the only way to keep the sites out of the box when doing the magic linking...

I did a few tests upon sites for this exact reason, allow to naturally link, build links and then use a link legal agreement, and the later seems to be the only way to keep them out so everyone is not linking in and throwing the site into the box on the owners behalf.

A possible suggestion to help you out in future circumstances maybe!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what your saying Andy, as I have found the magic sauce to beat the box also, though I won&#8217;t mention that. I know Google say all the nonsense about letting a site build naturally, blah blah blah, but honestly, they punish us when doing that. They say not to buy, if caught, their algo will punish us&#8230; lose lose. I found the best part of the secret is to use a legal link policy, where people just aren&#8217;t aloud to link to a site without written consent. If they do, they remove it, or go legal action&#8230; it seems to be the only way to keep the sites out of the box when doing the magic linking&#8230;</p>
<p>I did a few tests upon sites for this exact reason, allow to naturally link, build links and then use a link legal agreement, and the later seems to be the only way to keep them out so everyone is not linking in and throwing the site into the box on the owners behalf.</p>
<p>A possible suggestion to help you out in future circumstances maybe!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/01/04/how-the-frack-is-link-building-blog-still-sandboxed/comment-page-1/#comment-657</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=85#comment-657</guid>
		<description>Possibly it is because of this,

http://www.searchenginegenie.com/seo-blog/2006/01/what-causes-sandbox-filter-new.html
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly it is because of this,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.searchenginegenie.com/seo-blog/2006/01/what-causes-sandbox-filter-new.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.searchenginegenie.com/seo-blog/2006/01/what-causes-sandbox-filter-new.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nuevojefe</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2006/01/04/how-the-frack-is-link-building-blog-still-sandboxed/comment-page-1/#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>nuevojefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 21:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=85#comment-656</guid>
		<description>&quot;you only registered the domain for one year ahead and its a fresh domain. you should&#039;ve registered for at least 3-4 years, and i bet you&#039;d be indexed. &quot;

He is indexed. And no, all things considered, that would not be the magic bullet for him.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;you only registered the domain for one year ahead and its a fresh domain. you should&#8217;ve registered for at least 3-4 years, and i bet you&#8217;d be indexed. &#8221;</p>
<p>He is indexed. And no, all things considered, that would not be the magic bullet for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
