<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Loves Seniors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/10/26/google-loves-seniors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/10/26/google-loves-seniors/</link>
	<description>on Link Marketing &#38; News at Text Link Ads</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 09:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arizona Web Site Design</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/10/26/google-loves-seniors/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Arizona Web Site Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 13:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=78#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Facts On Domain Age
When valuing a domain you have to look beyond just the link and age related equity it already has built up. How self reinforcing are its key attributes? Would it be easy for someone else to steamroll over your key widget by throwing a bit of ajax on a similar tool? Does a newer competitor have a richer community driven environment that is picking up steam? Are your links next to impossible for others to get? How official or legitimate does the name sound? Will you be able to build it into something that can continue to gain traction and authority? Or is it going to be a site surviving on past popularity until it withers away?
SEO
http://www.virtualstudiopros.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facts On Domain Age<br />
When valuing a domain you have to look beyond just the link and age related equity it already has built up. How self reinforcing are its key attributes? Would it be easy for someone else to steamroll over your key widget by throwing a bit of ajax on a similar tool? Does a newer competitor have a richer community driven environment that is picking up steam? Are your links next to impossible for others to get? How official or legitimate does the name sound? Will you be able to build it into something that can continue to gain traction and authority? Or is it going to be a site surviving on past popularity until it withers away?<br />
SEO<br />
<a href="http://www.virtualstudiopros.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.virtualstudiopros.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pink</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/10/26/google-loves-seniors/comment-page-1/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Pink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 08:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=78#comment-487</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard MC talk about domains having different types of websites over the years... as if it was easy for him to tell that a domain once was about one subject matter, and then changed to a different subject matter. I believe he referred to this as a sign of trust. I heard this at least once at PubCon/Vegas.
This made me think that the length of time a domain has been used for a specific topic is what really matters, not just the length of time the domain has been registered. Of course if the domain was parked on your own server, with a simple page with info about whatever subject matter you will eventually build-out on the site, this may be enough to allow the trust to build.
http://www.pinkisthenewblog.info

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard MC talk about domains having different types of websites over the years&#8230; as if it was easy for him to tell that a domain once was about one subject matter, and then changed to a different subject matter. I believe he referred to this as a sign of trust. I heard this at least once at PubCon/Vegas.<br />
This made me think that the length of time a domain has been used for a specific topic is what really matters, not just the length of time the domain has been registered. Of course if the domain was parked on your own server, with a simple page with info about whatever subject matter you will eventually build-out on the site, this may be enough to allow the trust to build.<br />
<a href="http://www.pinkisthenewblog.info" rel="nofollow">http://www.pinkisthenewblog.info</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website of the day</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/10/26/google-loves-seniors/comment-page-1/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Website of the day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=78#comment-486</guid>
		<description>Can I check the domain list from somewhere?

Thanks
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I check the domain list from somewhere?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/10/26/google-loves-seniors/comment-page-1/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=78#comment-485</guid>
		<description>Domain Age one of the Biggest Poin in SEO.
Most of us know that the age of a domain is one of the single most important criteria of the Google algo. I&#039;d put it as a top ten - maybe top five - filter. It is a gate keeper.
The real question to me is if that matters on a parked or doa domain? We have some domains 10years old this month that have never had sites on them. I am wondering if there is a default value there because of the age? Is it a pure whois thing? Or is it an age of the inbound links thing?

http://www.fundouble.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domain Age one of the Biggest Poin in SEO.<br />
Most of us know that the age of a domain is one of the single most important criteria of the Google algo. I&#8217;d put it as a top ten &#8211; maybe top five &#8211; filter. It is a gate keeper.<br />
The real question to me is if that matters on a parked or doa domain? We have some domains 10years old this month that have never had sites on them. I am wondering if there is a default value there because of the age? Is it a pure whois thing? Or is it an age of the inbound links thing?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fundouble.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.fundouble.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: club</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/10/26/google-loves-seniors/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>club</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 03:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=78#comment-484</guid>
		<description>I heard that its not how old it is literaly, i.e. in the whois registration; but rather it matters how old it is in that of how ling it has been indexed in the search engines- which as a general rule can be determined by archive.org
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that its not how old it is literaly, i.e. in the whois registration; but rather it matters how old it is in that of how ling it has been indexed in the search engines- which as a general rule can be determined by archive.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

