<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Link Building by Buying Web Sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/07/27/link-building-by-buying-web-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/07/27/link-building-by-buying-web-sites/</link>
	<description>on Link Marketing &#38; News at Text Link Ads</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 09:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Esoos Bobnar</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/07/27/link-building-by-buying-web-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Esoos Bobnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=54#comment-196</guid>
		<description>&#039;Course, I suppose you could just throw that domain on a credit card that&#039;s not connected to your business, and problem solved.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Course, I suppose you could just throw that domain on a credit card that&#8217;s not connected to your business, and problem solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esoos Bobnar</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/07/27/link-building-by-buying-web-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Esoos Bobnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 06:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=54#comment-195</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m interested in the same point that pleeker brought up. Does that fact that Google is a registrar negate the effect of this tactic, at least somewhat?

At some point that domain record will have to be updated, and you end up with a bunch of sites owned by the same company all pointing at one of their sites.

Not necessarily a problem, but it could be, depending on how agressive you got with your linking.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested in the same point that pleeker brought up. Does that fact that Google is a registrar negate the effect of this tactic, at least somewhat?</p>
<p>At some point that domain record will have to be updated, and you end up with a bunch of sites owned by the same company all pointing at one of their sites.</p>
<p>Not necessarily a problem, but it could be, depending on how agressive you got with your linking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarrod Hunt</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/07/27/link-building-by-buying-web-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarrod Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 03:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=54#comment-194</guid>
		<description>Microsoft used this tactic when they bought www.linkexchange.com last year.  They still rank #4 (recently down from #2) for link exchange.

Looks like the tactic worked very well for them.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft used this tactic when they bought <a href="http://www.linkexchange.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.linkexchange.com</a> last year.  They still rank #4 (recently down from #2) for link exchange.</p>
<p>Looks like the tactic worked very well for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pleeker</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/07/27/link-building-by-buying-web-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>pleeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=54#comment-193</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s another issue to be thinking about -- when you buy the web site and domain, Google will find out if you bother to update the domain record, as they&#039;re an accredited registrar and have access to all that data. And domain-related information was part of the recent patent filing they did, too. So as Tal said -- you want to avoid explicit connection.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s another issue to be thinking about &#8212; when you buy the web site and domain, Google will find out if you bother to update the domain record, as they&#8217;re an accredited registrar and have access to all that data. And domain-related information was part of the recent patent filing they did, too. So as Tal said &#8212; you want to avoid explicit connection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tal</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/07/27/link-building-by-buying-web-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Tal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 17:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=54#comment-192</guid>
		<description>Be careful that you competitors bad reputation will not stick to your site. As you said, they are unprofessional in 90% of the cases. In this case a recommendation for them worth nothing except from the actual link. However, I must say that this method could be very nice if you avoid explicit connection and if you buy it really cheap.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be careful that you competitors bad reputation will not stick to your site. As you said, they are unprofessional in 90% of the cases. In this case a recommendation for them worth nothing except from the actual link. However, I must say that this method could be very nice if you avoid explicit connection and if you buy it really cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

