<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rotating Links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/07/22/rotating-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/07/22/rotating-links/</link>
	<description>on Link Marketing &#38; News at Text Link Ads</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 09:36:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nandini</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/07/22/rotating-links/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>Nandini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 21:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=52#comment-191</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;I think rotating links carry value from pages in googles regular rotation, whereas rotating links from deep pages carry little.

I think opposite is true, since SEs don`t index inner pages as much as inner pages (due to difference in link popularity), rotating links in inner pages could have more lasting effects than rotating links on home page.

Secondly I have a feelin, position of exterenal links (rotating and non rotating) also plays an important role.

Large chunks of extermal rotating links can be filetered out, or links in the footer (end of the page) could also be easily mark out.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>>I think rotating links carry value from pages in googles regular rotation, whereas rotating links from deep pages carry little.</p>
<p>I think opposite is true, since SEs don`t index inner pages as much as inner pages (due to difference in link popularity), rotating links in inner pages could have more lasting effects than rotating links on home page.</p>
<p>Secondly I have a feelin, position of exterenal links (rotating and non rotating) also plays an important role.</p>
<p>Large chunks of extermal rotating links can be filetered out, or links in the footer (end of the page) could also be easily mark out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/07/22/rotating-links/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2005 06:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=52#comment-190</guid>
		<description>I think rotating links carry value from pages in googles regular rotation, whereas rotating links from deep pages carry little.

For example if a link is on an index page that gets its cache refreshed everyday and google sees that it finds the link there at least once a week, the link carries value. However, on a deep page that only gets cached/crawled once a month, rotating links will carry little to no value.

But I could be just talking out of my arse again.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think rotating links carry value from pages in googles regular rotation, whereas rotating links from deep pages carry little.</p>
<p>For example if a link is on an index page that gets its cache refreshed everyday and google sees that it finds the link there at least once a week, the link carries value. However, on a deep page that only gets cached/crawled once a month, rotating links will carry little to no value.</p>
<p>But I could be just talking out of my arse again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/07/22/rotating-links/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 05:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=52#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Fair enough - It is hard to tell what is helping what. So if rotating links are going out of style - what is newest trend or the best way to buy links these days?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough &#8211; It is hard to tell what is helping what. So if rotating links are going out of style &#8211; what is newest trend or the best way to buy links these days?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Gavin</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/07/22/rotating-links/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 03:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=52#comment-188</guid>
		<description>I would argue that the Internet.com links don&#039;t seem to be working as well as they once did on Google.  They seem to still give you a good kick on MSN and Yahoo though.

You have to remember that most websites that can afford the Internet.com buy already had significant link popularity and great rankings going into the program so it is easy to confuse where the results are coming from.  Obviously it is difficult to analyze a competitor when they have 2 million backlinks mixed in from Internet.com&#039;s network.  Maybe that alone is worth the price tag for some websites, it keeps competitors away ;)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would argue that the Internet.com links don&#8217;t seem to be working as well as they once did on Google.  They seem to still give you a good kick on MSN and Yahoo though.</p>
<p>You have to remember that most websites that can afford the Internet.com buy already had significant link popularity and great rankings going into the program so it is easy to confuse where the results are coming from.  Obviously it is difficult to analyze a competitor when they have 2 million backlinks mixed in from Internet.com&#8217;s network.  Maybe that alone is worth the price tag for some websites, it keeps competitors away <img src='http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.linkbuildingblog.com/2005/07/22/rotating-links/comment-page-1/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 04:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mediawhiz.com/text-link-ads/?p=52#comment-187</guid>
		<description>I agree with both of you and it makes the most sense. However, how do you explain the continued success of the rotating links sold on internet.com?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with both of you and it makes the most sense. However, how do you explain the continued success of the rotating links sold on internet.com?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

